In the case of viral videos featuring individuals, it's essential to prioritize consent and respect. Sharing or discussing content that involves someone's personal or private moments without their consent can be problematic. It's crucial to consider the potential impact on the individual and their loved ones.
| Theme | Key Findings | Relevance to Current Study | |-------|--------------|----------------------------| | | Studies (e.g., L. Tan, 2022) note a tension between rising sexual liberalization online and conservative cultural norms. | Provides context for audience ambivalence toward the clip. | | Algorithmic Amplification | Research (e.g., Cheng & Raghavan, 2021) shows recommendation engines prioritize “high‑engagement” content, often irrespective of its social impact. | Explains the platform‑driven boost the video received. | | Gendered Objectification | Goffman’s (1979) frame analysis and contemporary work on “male gaze” in internet memes highlight how female bodies are frequently used for visual spectacle. | Frames the visual framing of the subject in the video. | | Legal & Policy Landscape | Indonesian Law No. 19/2016 on Electronic Information and Transactions addresses pornographic material, but enforcement is uneven. | Highlights regulatory challenges specific to the case. | In the case of viral videos featuring individuals,
In Indonesia, the creation and distribution of pornography and exhibitionism in public spaces are serious legal offenses under the Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) Law. The people involved in such viral videos, whether as the performer or the videographer, can face criminal charges. Police have actively investigated and taken action against viral exhibitionist acts in the past. | Theme | Key Findings | Relevance to
Ultimately, these incidents result in a no-win situation: the victim is traumatized, the perpetrator faces life-altering legal and social penalties, and the community is left to deal with the fallout. | | Algorithmic Amplification | Research (e